Friendly-General-723 Collective Consciousness 8 mo. Makes every world a fortress so just expand enough to have planet choke points then turtle with dedicated tech worlds. . Tips on playing wide? So i am trying to play more wide and less tall but i seem to have a problem. Those people are wrong, as are you. ChronicallyDepressed. Because it is not wide that is better, it is big. Ryika Jan 29, 2022 @ 11:08pm. 75% boost to the planetary designation on. There are several reasons for this but the primary factors are how pops are obtained, how resources are produced, and the way new things are created. Both can do it well as planets are not the bottleneck any more for science generation. Stellaris Tall vs Wide, which is better? Wide, the answer is wide. Planets are capped in tiles, jobs and housing. But the real mechanic at play with Tall vs. The problems with Stellaris, tall empires, 3. A place to share content, ask questions and/or talk about the 4X grand strategy…The main problem is that Stellaris is a game of resources and pops are the most precious one, tall empires are awful in those regards and they also run the risk of lagging behind in the tech department which is bad. Less pops equals less resources. A tech tree geared to this Play style would be. A Void Dweller run will play completely differently from a Nihilistic Acquisition raider run, which will play completely differently from a one-planet-challenge run. You can no longer colonize large swaths of space with a vassal swarm either. 8 tall isn't as viable anymore, can anyone give me a fleshed out strategy/perspective?If you're playing wide that sprawl is very low. Remember, planet growth slows when you are expanding, so a constant early game expansion slows your making use of said things. Tall was a Stillbirth in Stellaris. Stellaris. Play tall on the short term, get bio ascension, make sturdy and strong pops, then start a conquering spree. Especially if you've been away for 1-2 years. Playing Tall vs Wide. Hello my most pious followers. What i would really like, is to play a geographically small empire but with high population planets and systems (i believe it's possible to have pops on a space platform, but i never seen them). Tall play has been seriously buffed in this patch. The only playstyle I do not enjoy is playing with vassals, because I do not fully understand how to make that work and the little bits I do understand just make it seem rather bland. For this approach, you'd want origins that can benefit as early as possible from. . With that in mind I think it's a step in the right direction for that kind of. Best. R5: I just love having vassals and building a hegemony over conquest. Always play on max star count. 7) ASpec 195K subscribers Join Subscribe 6. It doesn't work in Stellaris (at least in 3. I made a lot of mistakes and read a lot of info on the web and looked at a lot of videos but nowhere do they really teach you how to play. the main contributor to a viable tall play Megacorp's are Stellaris "tall" playstyle. In Civ 4, which is an actual 4x game unlike Stellaris, playing "tall" is viable. 2; 1; Reactions: Reply. 818 votes, 167 comments. This way, I can research powerful weapons and shields for my Corvette and Cruiser swarm. . Playing tall is a strategy among others, it's not really a playstyle as it can be in some other games (well, mostly Civ5 in fact, and it's really just another word for turtling). Realistically when going tall it means some small set of orbital mines and research stations that weren't your core priority anyways - the core priority ones were covered by your frontier outposts to begin with. ago A common misunderstanding is that playing tall means having a small number of systems. Base habitat, with the size modifier, will have maybe half population growth from size penalties. Welcome to the patricians way to play Stellaris. This reduces the number of different buildings you expect to build on each planet. 0 has a severe unity bug) - when it comes to both unity and research, more planets is always better. 3 update damages the ability to play wide, going tall is the smarter play. Given that EUIV’s features aren’t currently available in Stellaris, the. It gets in my way of actually being able to play. A “tall” game usually involves investing in and building up your local empire rather than focusing on expansion. . The big idea with playing tall will. . Since tall isn't a particularly viable long-term strategy, however, skipping those structures and investing the resources into widening your empire is likely more optimal. I won by playing a Megacorp. Report. This dichotomy really isn't applicable to Stellaris. If I'm playing tall, I'm aiming to keep my empire size below 100. Yup. Playing tall or playing wide, which is better!? Most players start by building and advancing their empires in stellaris with a typical : expand, then build out planets and other parts. Part 2 focuses on creating your civilization both in and out of game. Stellaris has an abstraction for Tall vs Wide in-game: the Empire Size mechanic. It doesn't work in Stellaris (at least in 3. . Weekly PSA: Habitat spam is the definition of playing wide. Here's what I personally like to do, and it works for me playing tall. Stack research until you burst, playing tall without Megacorp or Inward Perfection is tricky, and the problem is that going wide will almost always work out better for you, even with DLC. S Tier Origins in Stellaris. If you play tall right, you can get more than 15000 tech per month mid game. This would be opposed to expanding further into space through star bases or. But if you want to play tall how can we make the most out of y. I would like to clarify playing tall is not exactly overpowered however everyone has been saying it is weak and you cannot win while playing tall. Since you dont have many planets, you cannot match the natural pop growth of wide empires. The problem with that is the ai manages resources terribly so you’ll need to play on a higher difficulty in order to have an even fight. We will be (almost). Playing tall as Megacorp is very easy and you are an impossible Empire to conquer because defending your borders is very easy. ago. Just, because something is. Introduced with the title's Utopia expansion, habitats act as a tool that enables playing tall. Building slots don’t expand from population anymore and city districts do not expand them; so, every habitat will be a few slots big until end game. If you stick to 10 systems and spam a bunch of habitats you are playing tall. Give me the. Tall since well, ever, hasn’t been a great option but now more. So today we're going to take a look at a general overview of how to play a Tall empire. Go to Stellaris r/Stellaris • by Nimitz-View community ranking In the Top 1% of largest communities on Reddit. We will use these. Highly stable, unified group thats close proximity keeps together. It's not about having fewer planets, but about having less directly controlled space. My 2 cents: tall and wide is a bit nebulous. walter. Essentially, tall and wide shouldn’t be wildly different as far as pop count goes. The extra difficulty in higher difficulties is getting to where you can get to late game. 2;. r/Stellaris. Fast Breeders - This perk give +25% growth. That's enough to fight 25x in 2300. You want to find all the enclaves asap, kill monsters for more tech, and just generally get that tech up. Going into the fir. Advice Wanted. It does not really do much for Tall vs Wide development patterns. ago. Since you play pretty much the same if you have 50 habitats rather then 50 planets. 2. R5: The Alderson disk origin (added by gigastructual engineering) is a really fun game if you want to play tall. 22 Badges. I'd like to see Stellaris travel down this route with a focus on corruption and general population unrest the farther out a colony is settled to the point where your fringe worlds need a constantly police or military presence to keep subdued unless you. The meta has shifted a lot throughout Stellaris’s life cycle and will likely shift a lot more in the future. Subscribe to downloadChoices Matter: Tall vs. In Stellaris tall games are a lot of fun where you limit yourself to around 20 systems and play as a galactic defender and mediator protecting the less advanced empires. Playing tall helps with the overwhelming amount of micro that Stellaris sometimes requires. Do it from system view. Honestly you should know better too. You need about 100 complex drones on a single planet (IE ring worlds or Ecumenopoli) for each bio trophy to be equal to a single robot and that is the RS's biggest issue. Indentured Servitude is the best kind of slavery, as it has the fewest job restrictions. Jul 10, 2023. Tall in stellaris is weird, since planets just exist nothing really stops you from conquering some big planets, and building ecumenopolis or ringworlds. You can do quite well by building a few colonies on nice big planets, and using wars to establish a lot of vassals and tributaries. The only way I can define Tall in Stellaris is when you focus heavily on science from day one to make your POP more efficient. DoeCommaJohn. You get more yeild from the planet as far as resources plus more space for research labs. 0 making playing tall a viable strategy. By mid- and certainly in the late game you should have a resource extraction planets feeding production and research planets. Stellaris. Too many planets to manage. Considering the asking price I suggest of buying this DLC only if you are interested in playing as a Megacorp or if you already have a good selection of DLCs. That doesn't mean a low amount of colonies; in fact, often more. 8K 89K views 4 weeks ago Stellaris Tall Build Guide. In Stellaris, it would be really nice if there was a way to convert to tall play after the game starts, because sometimes your start location just doesn't prevent peaceful expansion. First things first; your ethics should be materialist-authoritarian-militarist or fanatic materialist-militarist. Corporation (almost mandatory for a tall empire) With aquatic + agrarian + thriffy = maximum performance for food and trade value. Been playing stellaris for a little bit now let’s say a couple of months and I was wondering if playing tall is worth it I’ve heard mixed opinions on the topic but if it is worth it could you all give me some tips!Well there is a method of playing 'tall'. 0 growth). I keep seeing stuff around the internet about 2. I think my problem is that i am too eager to expend. I'm crushing on tall on hardest on my current game, dominant by the 2300's, overwhelming by 2400. Conventional wisdom is that playing wide is easier than playing tall, but my experience has been the opposite. A "tall" empire's colonies aren't going to be much stronger or more populated than a wide empire's colonies. Are you using the -dx11 option and borderless window, because trust me Stellaris is NOT single threaded, there was a dev blog post specifically discussing this in the past. 419K subscribers in the Stellaris community. Paradox, Please Let Us Play Tall. Relic world start is pretty good if you can get a few planets to fuel. I would say going tall is even more viable now. Stellaris. It is great for high difficulties because you don’t have to attack the really powerful empires and can get them to pathetic by mid to late game. Playing tall has genuine benefits in terms of potential mid to late game expansion. Unless a lower setting is fine for the Tall. Which requires lots of claimed stars and colonized planets. 3 with the elimination of admin cap. Even before 2. 06c (updated 11/14/05). Branch offices provide you a large income supplement, particularly credits, allowing you to focus your own economy. I play tall and use tributaries. Forcing it to inevitably conquer them as time goes on No it doesn't. You can rightfully play this by ONLY claiming systems with huge planets with lots of room for research and skipping over systems with. Best. Cap one or 2 worlds at a time, set food limit to 5k and munch your way to the diabetis throne. Nothing you do by restricting planets/ habitats offers you anything which you do not get when going wide. It would mimick a wide play power curve, but with a tall looking empire. Paradox you're doing it all wrong. The stations, planets and habitats are improvements of that sector. If you're spamming habitats, you aren't playing tall. Byzantine is a personal favourite of mine, and whilst playing tall admin sprawl is usually an issue. General. Best. Generally, if you can have a large number of planets, there is little reason not to do so, since they will all develop more or less at the same pace. While Tall empires aren’t currently competitively viable, there are some features that lean towards a tall playstyle, and can be used as starters, points for praise, or references for further development. Tall v wide is a bit of a false construct in stellaris specifically (always has been). others will catch up sooner or later. Keeping a small easily defended area is playing tall. You'll have tall/wide elements in all empires depending on how you play, whether you're role-playing or not, whether you're playing single or multi and also your ethos and civics. I finished a rear admiral playthrough as a megacorp recently, no gameplay-changing mods. 8 no DLC. r/Stellaris. Playing tall is very effective as long as you play smart. Techno Necro. 0 there is no difference between science going tall or wide. Play fanatic pacifist,Use megacorp only in early game,After 3rd civic slot,Convert to democracy,Use Functional Architecture,Beacon of Liberty,Meritocracy. But it’s basicaly giving yourself a handicap for little to no reason. ago. That's a 70% increase. A big part of the goals behind this update is to also make the “tall” playstyle a viable option again. This includes systems such as the Sanctuary ringworld system, the system with the planet Zanaam and any special systems in the DLC (if you have the appropriate DLC). In practice this means you build Habitats, Ring-Worlds, Dyson Sphere and Science Nexus. 0 has brought massive changes to how buildings are acquired, how pops grow and how districts work. That require you to explore and have them in your territory. Stellaris Tall vs. ago. It does require playing the game a lot differently than previously though. I don't know what version you're playing, but population growth is glacial in 3. With the changes made in 3. Stellaris was released in 2016, and it's only been six years. In 5 hours I will play Stellaris with my friends. Either that. tall mechanism, so you are not forced to conquer new territories to become stronger. Fan demand for equally balanced tall playstyles has hindered game enjoyability. Get heroic past (+1 trait) and meritocracy (+1 trait pick) Step 2. Compare Stellaris to a game where you can play tall, and playing tall is strong: Civ 5. That is, you stay small for some time so you can: - focus on science. There's 2 ways to play Stellaris. Imo the best definition of play wide is a lot of systems. and the edicts and all the other bonuses from low empire size aren't enough as a semi wide empire would be. Spoken like someone who isn’t even seven feet tall! Step 1: get boxed in by superior powers. I could just settle and terraform more planets to make more stations, but that is a long term and expensive process. and also having a planet to grow pops on (and then relocate them home) lets you grow a lot faster. Weekly PSA's PSA- the definition of playing wide is disputed, and many people use systems as opposed to planets as the model in Stellaris. Galactic footprint is a common usage for "wide vs tall" so you're not wrong, but op is correct in terms of game mechanics. They would be also wrong. Okokok this is a pretty cool story, but of a long one but still. The faster you can fill up your planets the better, as you're going to be going wide VERY fast and grabbing every planet you can see. The other is increased Trade for Xenophile, the Megacorp's Default Capital ruler job Executive and their unity job Manager make trade on the side of their primary output. stellaris is a dynamic game, and rebellions and other events always change up the galaxy. Playstyles are how a player plans to tackle playing or even winning the game. "Tall" in Stellaris isn't doing more with less, it's just having less. In Stellaris, you don't make that choice. Evokes a kind of 'hazard warning' feeling. Imo the best definition of play wide is a lot of systems. When I look at some people's screenshots here, I see that some have naval caps in the 300's and 400's at the same time as I'm playing (early 24th century). The tall playstyle dines like a gourmet only picking the very best and shunning the crud. #1. Megastructures aren't the only way to succeed when playing tall. It is my philosophy, and thus the mod's, that a 'Tall' empire is one with. Here's what I personally like to do, and it works for me playing tall. The game itself doesn't lend itself to tall play, as the main way the empire can grow is to have as much minerals as possible. all needs a big overhaul. How to Manage Empire Size in Stellaris. If you happen to trigger a certain precursor, but then the areas where their events can spawn end up occupied by other empires, you can be left with 0/6 hints. I have been thinking about something like this since playing a tall Void Dwellers game right after a very successful wide Overtuned game, but the work involved in sorting it all out was. This mod makes all the special systems in stellaris have a 100% chance of spawning. Playing tall infers having fewer and more productive planets instead of a ton of mediocre planets. ago. Now, the Hives that eat people have it easier: Expand like the fckn spanish flu and produce food by eating people. but a bunch of people would scream bloody murder about how they “nerfed” wide play styles so I doubt it will happen. And size of empire directly influences size of your navy. In some updates, it was a very effective strategy to get ahead technologically and get early ascensions - it's much less the case now. We have "wide with many systems" and "wide with few systems, but those systems contain thirty billion habitats". The player "developed" these systems to the heights of their abilities, using Habitats and Ringworlds. Edit: I also think that playing pacifists is definitely the go-to way to try playing a tall empire, since you're kinda forced into it, as you can't conquer other empires territory. ago. Empire sprawl will stay low if you play tall which allows you to tech up and tradition ascend at fast rate. If you make playing wide miserable thats bad too, because for many painting the map is. Okay, first things first, if you PLAN to play tall go for the pacifist build and just switch out later on. the tech tree ends at some point and the. This has fundamentally altered a few things about gameplay, but fear not; Things are arguably better for tall builds in the long run, now that large empires have been nerfed and pop growth is no longer quite so exponential. Use the outpost cost ethic and build plenty of outposts. the best origins for making the game harder are: Doomsday. 3; 1; 1; Reactions:. I don't understand how playing tall in this game works. Step 1. Yes, even when playing wide you still try to play as tall as possible but you first focus on expansion. Yeah, I actually agree I don't think Stellaris really has 'tall' playstyles because of the way pops and economics work, I don't think you so much as play tall, but as varying levels of efficient. It is viable to for example use diplomacy and just build shit loads of habitats to grow populations and form alliances and federations and mostly invade to create new versions of your own empire and include them in your federations. Then tried a mixed economy run aimed at going tall and setting up strong vassals but was stymied when I realized 3 planets in 28 systems was incredibly unlucky and having anamoly researchers was actually. It is great for high difficulties because you don’t have to attack the really powerful empires and can get them to pathetic by mid to late game. That also doesn't fix a billion unnecessary pop ups per game, half of the anomalies requiring manual intervention that consisted of "click buttan. Tall vs Wide in Stellaris isn't a dichotomy, but rather a spectrum from one extreme to the other. The 3. Other good tradition trees for Void Dwellers include Domination (more influence and housing), Prosperity (more minerals, more specialist output, another building slot). This may be changing in 3. I played Stellaris for at least 200 hours before I won my first game. There are Stellaris gurus that will tell you that by building up pops in preference to acquiring systems is playing tall. Very high output per system for when your packed in. A place to share content, ask questions and/or talk about the 4X grand strategy game Stellaris by…. The core mechanics of Stellaris are absolutely compatible with Tall vs Wide, it is just that wide has had repeated postive improvements over the course of the games development, frequently at the expense of tall play. Guaranteed Special System Spawn. It is how the terms have worked for the majority of games since I was paying by the minute to access the internet. 3 and my solutions for it. Outside of this there is no "Tall" concept in Stellaris as more. The first 1000 people who click the link will get 2 free months of Skillshare Premium: Playing Tall has always been one of the more elu. Hi, I always play tall, up to 5 colonies, but right now I see it as dumb thing to do due to how easy it is to increase your empire sprawl limit with bureaucrats. Versus AI its possible to play tall but its harder than wide. The softcap, even under the initial 3. I never played a Tall game before and usually rarely peaceful lol But sounds like a lot fun. 23. I have read a lot that playing wide, after 3. My recent game on insane I managed to beat the game (Huge map, 30 empires, 8 advanced and 4 fallen) in 2400 with only 5 planets in 2350. As a long time Crusader Kings 2. walter. #9. Going into the fir. While playing tall was pretty much building a lot of frontier outposts and having at most 3-4 planets. Driven Assimilators are some of the easiest robot empires to play. Currently it's 2460, there are 39 empires, I'm the permanent Galactic Custodian. For tall since you aren't conquering pops you MUST grow them. Title says it all. ago. 3. You misunderstood what "tall" means in Stellaris. One of the biggest changes is the name change from Empire Sprawl. I explored my immediate area, only went after systems that were "behind" chokepoints (from an outside perspective), and tried to get the basic strategic resources (motes. Clone army with the Ascendant path since you get 100 pops with +40% ruler output and +20% specialist output. At this building, I'm pretty certain declaring Imperium would be a net loss. So an interesting build: Play tall (ten systems and 2-3 planets). Bureaucrats killed tall. 0, we had several tall builds. However its not completely ridiculous as a way to differentiate play styles. r/Stellaris. 50 habitats is still less real estate than 50 planets though. Depeding on how many other empires there are, and where you are located, this can be a way to stay "tall" and dont have the feeling of that you are "wasting" systems out there. 2 councillor traits out of 3 is good enough for me. are vassals just a prerequisite of playing tall. Generally, there are 3 strategies you can mix and match. NB: this is system not planet. In fact it could be easier with more resources. This can boost its trade value over 80%. Option A is to build up your internal economy, with any commercial or trade agreements being bonuses to your own production. Hold chokepoints and rush tech, make friends and sign commercial pacts, start a trade league as soon as possible once you have one close ally, spam corporate embassies in your branch offices, and very soon you will be the only. S. It has factiond designed for playing tall. You can play tall empires by taking tributaries and vassals, its fully possible to only have a few planets while "owning" half the galaxy through your subjects. For tall, your best bet is a megacorp. You can mix and match whatever civics, ethics, and traits as you wish but fanatic xenophile will significantly help if you’re going down the trade route, and functional architecture helps void dwellers if you choose to go. I think my problem is that i am too eager to expend. . 3 was plenty to tackle every unmodded challenge available. Since your research requirements go up per each planet you colonize I find for me personally that it is better to only colonize larger worlds (15 tiles or more minimum). 273 upvotes · 38 comments. Expand at all costs! Wide in general, less-wide if you intend to do an early war of conquest. What are some key things to do in Stellaris to build tall effectively? I want to play tall because I have been a wide, rapid expansionist in playstyle in basically every 4x/grand strategy game I've played. Playing tall means not taking very much territory but maximizing what the systems you do take can do. You use the early bonuses to advantage early-mid game expansion and transitioning into a wide. The extremes, right and left, are in the gutters. 3 a LOT. I've had several starts go right down the drain immediately because none of my surrounding stars have a single mineral in any of them, while neighboring empires have stars with 6-8+ minerals per. Let's get the disclaimer out of the way first: traditional tall tech-focused builds just aren't very strong in the current version of Stellaris, and get easily out-teched by wide builds. #56. 4) playing tall was always a losing strategy and only something you do for roleplay or challenge reasons. You stick to yourself, and they like it. Go to Stellaris r/Stellaris. If you play at higher difficulties, then it’s supposed to be hard. "Tall" no longer exists in versions after that change. e. . When people say they're playing tall in Stellaris, they generally mean one of two things: Either they're just playing a small nation, or they're playing a "compact" nation, with large numbers of habitats/ringworlds in a small number of systems. I always run into economic defects, Overpopulation and being serounded by larger empire's. It can however be pretty challenging on to get right. 48. That depends on what you mean by playing tall. I've done a lot of spreadsheeting and playtesting on tech-focus builds, and I'm of the opinion that your ideal mid-game size is 20-30 planets, which no one. With that being said, playing tall in Stellaris is a lot harder than you think! How, then, can you get started playing tall in this game? Keep reading to discover our comprehensive guide! Set Your Limits See moreHow to play tall? I thought the changes to unity, particularly the planetary ascension mechanic, would make it ideal for a corporate empire to play tall, so I gave it. If you're going for clone ascendant, you really don't want to be slavers on top of that, otherwise you're just locking yourself to 5 planets until you research synthetics. It would mimick a wide. Go for Bio-Ascension for cloning vats. ago. Most people talk about Tall vs Wide like this: Wide involves getting a lot of territory, getting a lot of pops, and dominating the galaxy with overwhelming numbers; contrasted with playing Tall, which is about leaving a small galactic footprint but focusing your economy to keep up. Weekly PSA's PSA- the definition of playing wide is disputed, and many people use systems as opposed to planets as the model in Stellaris. Business, Economics, and Finance. . large empire size) at present. For how to: watch some of montuplays newest guides regarding playing tall. This is your Definitive Guide for "How to Play Tall" in Stellaris Console Edition! If you want to learn in Stellaris How to Play Tall then this Stellaris Pla. A few years ago, playing tall was the only way to win, and beginner players were asking what this is and how they go about doing it. I’ve mentioned that playing tall empires gets boring late game. Two strategies stand out when we talk about empire size. 1" patch out on the 14th shouldn't really change habitat. Having lots of systems is not a wide play-style, having. However, I am interested in playing tall, since maybe this is the best strategy for me. After a while, re-change your pops so that those on habitats get great specialist traits and those on planets get good worker traits. Stellaris is probably the best paradox game to play tall because stellaris. They now cost twice as much and are roughly half as effective as they used to be. It's like having a huge empire to defend, but you don't get the huge economy to go with it. 3 is a bad idea. Jun 27, 2017;. Planets and habitats within the same system counts as one system (but all there pops go towards pops penalty) The 0,01 penalty is the 1% penalty to research for each pop over 10 you have in your kingdom. I prefer to use my custom made tall chair and pc table to play tall. Compare Stellaris. 2 or 1. Bribe them, then submit to vassalisation. Assuming your goal is to win, which version of Stellaris was playing "tall" a valid strategy of winning? Because in my experience, (I started around 1. Finally, Part 3 contains a mix of tips and tricks for you to use to take your roleplaying to the next level. 416K subscribers in the Stellaris community. HopeFox • 6 yr. "Tall" in Stellaris isn't doing more with less, it's just having less. Building slots don’t expand from population anymore and city districts do not expand them; so, every habitat will be a few slots big until end game. They have a 100 pop max capacity and 35% bonus on specialist/ruler output. First things first, let's talk definitions - I describe 'going tall' in Stellaris as simply restricting oneself to never having sectors. All Discussions Screenshots Artwork Broadcasts Videos Workshop News Guides Reviews. [deleted] • 5 yr. Until now, playing “wide” and securing as much territory as possible was considered the only way to stay competitive with rival Empires. If you're going to war, every system claimed is most of a corvette in alloys and a few dozen influence, meaning fewer system claims and fewer corvettes to conquer them. 1. How to win at Stellaris: Play Wormhole only. For this approach, you'd want origins that can benefit as early as possible from.